Well, less complicated meta discussion that builds on years of discussion before that.
Do you mean this is true for non-journaling sites? It's interesting, because it seems to me on a forum, it would be easier to build on years of discussion--all of that discussion is there and fairly easy to read. On a journaling site to read older discussions you have to go to a whole bunch of individual journals, which can be really hard to do.
But on a journaling site, it's my experience that it's in the end easier to build deeper and more lasting relationships, so then it would be easier to have discussions that are the result of years--but only with people you know.
Explaining the why would take a long meta post.
If you ever do that meta post, I would be really interested in it!
no subject
Do you mean this is true for non-journaling sites? It's interesting, because it seems to me on a forum, it would be easier to build on years of discussion--all of that discussion is there and fairly easy to read. On a journaling site to read older discussions you have to go to a whole bunch of individual journals, which can be really hard to do.
But on a journaling site, it's my experience that it's in the end easier to build deeper and more lasting relationships, so then it would be easier to have discussions that are the result of years--but only with people you know.
Explaining the why would take a long meta post.
If you ever do that meta post, I would be really interested in it!